We all know the symbol with a vertical line in a circle: it identifies the On/Off power switch. It occurred to me that this familiar symbol is evolving in a bizarre fashion.
Originally, switches had a lever or slider that could move to either of two physical positions. In those days the switch was marked with the word POWER and its positions with ON and OFF. Then, as switches became smaller and more globalized, the two words were replaced with 1 and 0, as seen even today on many rocker switches.
And then the ubiquity of microprocessors made it more economic to do everything with momentary pushbutton switches; the computer inside could take care of figuring whether you meant ON or OFF. And so, the button now needed an icon that conveys both options; I surmise that is when the familiar “1-inside-a-0″ symbol came into existence (if you know otherwise do share in the comments!) This round icon fit nicely on round buttons, and became ubiquitous.
But then we start to see the form shown in the two photos above right: a bastardized version combining the 1-in-a-circle with a 1 in the same symbol. This makes no sense at all – the correct representation would have been 1/0, for On slash Off. Instead we get On slash OnOff. Sloppy thinking…
Such erroneous contractions are often seen in spoken language – as in “IT technology”, which expands to “information technology technology” (there’s even a company by that name, and its slogan, amusingly, is “We make sense of IT“). But now we see the same error invading the more compact space of visual symbols…
Awesome post, Nathan!
i believe the bastardized version of the on off switch actually is also a reset button. So rather than make another symbol for reset the decided to go with on /onoff i think it would make more sense to put on/onoff/off.
I used to think the 1 and the 0 symbols were retarded because nowhere are you told what either one meant. Now that i know that the 1 is a 1 and not just a line ,its not so retarded after all.
Thank you for setting me straight on these alien symbols.
Here is an explanation from IEC and ISO.
Related to the 0 with a broken ring and a 1 through it. It is soft off.
>>
For use on a power switch or button if the off state is soft-off, is variable, is not
known, or the distinction from hard-off is not important. Also for use with a
power indicator, or as the icon for the power control panel.
>>
I hope this help us to understand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_symbol
Excellent, informative and timely post Nathan!
We’d be very interested to know your thoughts on the matter of poor power switch design and function in general and especially what you think about “Bad design on a UPS” posted by Saaed at
http://onproductmanagement.wordpress.com/category/business-topics/product-management/
He writes “Last year, I got my hands on a pretty good UPS for my home computer network. It’s from APC. The model # is the XS1200. It’s a good UPS [which] can take 8 devices plugged into it. Six are managed, two are surge protected only. I’ve got all my critical devices plugged into it including my desktop computer, monitor, cable modem, router, some kind of phone/cable switching device (I get my home phone service through my cable provider), and a couple of other things.
Now, this is a great device except for one fatal flaw. The round circle on the front is the on/off switch for the UPS. It’s also a very sensitive switch. It doesn’t take more than the soft fingers of a 2 year old child to turn it off. Yes, to turn the whole darn UPS and all 8 devices connected to it off! … I’m sure you can picture what has happened more than once.”
See APC’s reply at:
http://www.apc-forums.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8068&tstart=0
I am a dummy. Is ‘1′ depressed on the rocker switch on or off?
‘1′ depressed on the rocker switch meant “on”, John.
There’s a place in England that’s called “Hill Hill Hill” in three different languages, but I can’t remember what it is. Thanks for this, I am setting up a new desktop, and one speaker said don’t plug this in with the power switch on, and I didn’t know which was on.
does anyone know if this symbol can be trademarked in the US?
To all, the symbol (-O) has nothing to do with 1 and zeros.
It means OPEN CIRCUIT CLOSED CIRCUIT from the old knife switch schematic. When it was written 1 and zeros were meaningless. I once asked a PHD what he thought it meant and he said ” On ” ” Off ” well duh, true meaning=OPEN CIRCUIT CLOSED CIRCUIT!
The only way I can ever remember which is the on and which is the off, is that the line (I never heard it was a ‘1′)is a straight line, as the power flows throught a power cord. The ‘0′ is like zero or no power flow through a power cord. Basically, I guess this is what Edward King’s comment was saying. What ever works for you.
Great post, I didn’t realize such combo on-on/off switches were being made. Hopefully it will stop soon.
On the other hand, why is the symbol for a closed circuit a line-segment and the symbol for an open circuit a closed loop? This seems to be the opposite of what it should really be.
When I worked at the science museum the guys in the workshop used to put selfmade stickers with “On” and “???” on all kinds of apparatus they made. Of course they didn’t mean to implicate a chicken would come out of the device, just a little bilingual word play you might enjoy.
Hey Esther, looks like Wordpress doesn’t take kindly to bilingual word play… it turned your Hebrew chicken into “???”! But I can deduce what you meant…
I was thinking maybe you press it to turn on or to go into standby because Wikipedia said that used to be the old standby symbol before the crescent moon.
I think it’s nuts that anyone would ever use glyphs that are not obvious
on something as important as a power switch. The first photograph above
that says “on” and “off” is clear to all but the retarded (or non English
speakers), the circle and line are not, even just based on a quick survey of
people in the office. If you want a good language-independent symbol, how
about a light bulb, and light bulb with lines coming out of it. Most people
would say it’s obvious the one with the lines means light (power) on.
It’s like the bit from Demolotion Man where the guy askes what the three shells
are for in the bathroom. If you have to ask, that’s telling you it’s confusing.
I ran across your site as I took delivery of a new power supply unit for my PC from Thermaltake. Looking at the power symbol, it shows only the 1 and 0. Until I saw your site, I had no idea that it represents binary 1 and 0.
Amazing that something as simple as a on/off illustration can cause so much confusion.
Now I know that the 1 means on and 0 means off (recalling my old electrical circuits enginnering class from mechanical engineering undergrad). Pretty sad that I didn’t even know how to read the 1 and 0.
Very helpful as I undergo out of PC testing of my new power supply unit so I don’t shock myself. Thank you!
For years I’ve been puzzling over those two symbols, the circle and the line, that often appear alongside rocker switches.
My first guess was that the circle must represent a closed circuit, i.e. “on,” and that the line, since it is in effect broken at each end, must represent an open circuit, i.e., “off.”
But from my experience with the way they actually work, it seems that the opposite may be the case.
Will in Seattle
a.k.a. “Clueless”
Hi again!
I just found this interesting document that shows a bunch of symbols and says the circle with the line in it means “standby.”
http://eetd.lbl.gov/Controls/overview/symbols1.pdf
It also confirms that my surmise that the line and circle represented circuit diagrams was, indeed, totally mistaken.
Oh well, live and learn, eh?
Will in Seattle
a.k.a. “Clueless”
In the 3/9/10 issue of the NY Daily. News there is picture of the power button logo with the title “Power up! City flips switch on new official condom.” Now the logo will also be synonymous with a male penetrating a female or another male. Gives another meaning to the phrase “Power Up.”
I have been in the same quandary for years. The symbol is ambiguous. First off, it certainly seems to show a circle and a bar. No sane person would interpret the symbols as a zero and a one (though, apparantly, that is what they are). Intuitively, I see a circle which looks most nearly looks like a tube or open conduit. And I see a bar which most nearly looks like a bar (duh!), a block or a wall. So with no outside help this symbol will mostly naturally be mistaken, for I see the circle as an open conduit for electricity (meaning-”on”) and I see the bar as a block to the possible flow of electricity (meaning-”off”). If the symbols were used in any non-electrical on/off applications my assumptions would need to be rethought, but I have never seen these symbols used in mechanical applications. I have more than a basic background in computers and can do binary mathematics, so the zero/one idea works really well for me. But, why on earth didn’t they make it look unmistakenly like a zero and a one? Go figure.
Please See comment dated……..above
Sep 2nd, 2008 at 4:55 pm
To all, the symbol (-O) has nothing to do with 1 and zeros.
It means OPEN CIRCUIT CLOSED CIRCUIT from the old knife switch schematic. When it was written 1 and zeros were meaningless. I once asked a PHD what he thought it meant and he said ” On ” ” Off ” well duh, true meaning=OPEN CIRCUIT CLOSED CIRCUIT!
Edward, your view has been noted before, and is an interesting derivation… I remember those knife switches in old gear. But other views exist too, and all are welcome to state their opinions on this blog!
Mr. Nathan Zeldes,
Sir, You are absolutely right, I apologize. My intent was not to mame, make fun of, I am above you or any other rude actions. As a humble electronic instructor, my passion gets away from me at times, I am so sorry. This site is the only one that has a practical understanding of the importance of this symbol. At the top there are 2 perfectly scaled pictures of both the text version and the glyph version of the symbol. Who ever picked these fine examples also have them aligned so the text “on” is above the “-” for clarity, brilliant. I use these pictures when I teach basic electronics to my students. As luck would have it, even if the symbol is misinterpreted as a digital 1 and 0 the on/off concept still works, a testament to how perfect the symbol is even in this modern digital age. Earl summarizes this elegantly also after my first post ” What ever works for you. ” Long live the on off symbol, it should be with us for a long time, I trust forever. Again, if I offended anyone I apologize in advance.
Sir
Thank you kindly
No apology needed, Edward, though it is appreciated!
Wow, I always thought the symbol was a representation of the Tubular pin tumbler lock (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tubular_pin_tumbler_lock)
I don’t know where I got this from, I just associated the act of locking and unlocking (making the item unavailable and unavailable) with turning something off and on.
The symbol looks like it I think, take a look at this picture:
http://www.royallock.com/cam/images/lock1f.gif
Quite interesting I think, but my dad used to have a computer which was turned off and on with a lock and key like this one.
@Kim Yes, I remember those round locks… they came standard on all early IBM PC machines. Not that I ever saw anyone use the lock, and eventually you could lock the machine in software so they disappeared.
I just think it’s funny how many people get confused about it… when it seems like even if you forget which is which… it’s obvious. Look at which is set, and look at the device. Is the device on? Then that’s the on symbol, and the other means off.
