<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Commonsense Design</title>
	<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com</link>
	<description>Nathan Zeldes blogs on everyday product design</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The left-handed staircases of the Kerrs</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/the-left-handed-staircases-of-the-kerrs/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/the-left-handed-staircases-of-the-kerrs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Odds and Ends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/the-left-handed-staircases-of-the-kerrs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we toured Scotland we visited an ancient building with a curious design feature: it had a  staircase that ran in a counterclockwise spiral, opposite to the standard design.
We were told that there are a number of such buildings in Scotland, all built by the same family. Apparently the Kerr family tended to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we toured Scotland we visited an ancient building with a curious design feature: it had a  staircase that ran in a counterclockwise spiral, opposite to the standard design.</p>
<p>We were told that there are a number of such buildings in Scotland, all built by the same family. Apparently the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clan_Kerr">Kerr family</a> tended to have many left-handed sons, and they built a number of their castles and buildings (notably <a href="http://www.ferniehirst.com/default.htm">Ferniehirst Castle</a>, in the 15th century) with counterclockwise spiral staircases, the idea being that a left handed person could defend them more easily (and perhaps also confuse the more common right handed enemies? although it seems that the latter would have some advantage on the attack).</p>
<p>Such a degree of custom design, geared to a genetic trait of one family, is interesting. It is also told that once they committed the architecture this way, they handled the fact that not all their fighting men were lefties by training those who weren&#8217;t to fight with the sword in their left hand anyway. Customize the building to the family, then customize the retainers to the building&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/the-left-handed-staircases-of-the-kerrs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tools 2: Choosing your supplier</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/tools-2-choosing-your-supplier/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/tools-2-choosing-your-supplier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Good design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Odds and Ends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/tools-2-choosing-your-supplier/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, if quality is critical, how do we find the best tools?
One simple method is to  go for the best makers; the ones the pros swear by. In my case I did that by  interrogating my machine shop teacher in university, a master craftsman with  decades of  experience. Basically it went [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>So, if quality is critical, </strong>how do we find the best tools?</p>
<p>One simple method is to  go for the best makers; the ones the pros swear by. In my case I did that by  interrogating my machine shop teacher in university, a master craftsman with  decades of  experience. Basically it went like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/nicholsonfile.jpg" alt="Nicholson File" align="right" height="258" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="250" /></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Me: </strong>what is the best make of hand files?<br />
<strong> Master: </strong>why do you want to know?  These are not for a hobbyist; they&#8217;d be too expensive for you anyway.<br />
<strong> Me: </strong>Oh,  I&#8217;m just curious.<br />
<strong> Master:</strong> you aren&#8217;t going to buy them, Right?<br />
<strong> Me: </strong>Perish  the thought! I only want to know.<br />
<strong> Master: </strong>You&#8217;re sure?<br />
<strong> Me:</strong> Cross my  heart.<br />
<strong> Master: </strong>well, the best files are made by Nicholson; but you have to  make sure it&#8217;s the <em>Dutch</em> Nicholson. Nicholson also has a factory in Canada,  those are not quite as good.<br />
<strong> Me: </strong>Thanks!</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>And then</strong> I&#8217;d rush off to buy some Dutch  Nicholson files.</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/nicholsonfiles.jpg" alt="Nicholson Files" height="246" vspace="10" width="500" /></p>
<p>Those files serve me well to this day, though in all fairness, I suspect the  Canadian ones would have served just as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/07/tools-2-choosing-your-supplier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A pure waste of time</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/a-pure-waste-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/a-pure-waste-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bad design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/a-pure-waste-of-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just got off the phone at a teleconference meeting hosted by some service in the USA. I was impressed by the logic of the automated system, which went something like this:
&#8220;Welcome to the ___ teleconference system. Please enter your passcode&#8221;.
&#60;I did&#62;
&#8220;The number you entered is &#60;bla bla bla&#8230; all 9 digits read slowly&#62;.
Please press one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got off the phone at a teleconference meeting hosted by some service in the USA. I was impressed by the logic of the automated system, which went something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p><font color="#000000">&#8220;Welcome to the ___ teleconference system. Please enter your passcode&#8221;.<br />
&lt;I did&gt;<br />
&#8220;The number you entered is &lt;bla bla bla&#8230; all 9 digits read slowly&gt;.<br />
Please press one if this is the correct passcode, or two to re-enter the code&#8221;.</font></p></blockquote>
<p>What on earth could make them think this is a good idea? Why not just test the number and only if it is incorrect ask for it again?!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/a-pure-waste-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tools 1: Quality matters!</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/tools-1-quality-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/tools-1-quality-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Good design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Odds and Ends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/tools-1-quality-matters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the everyday objects you will own, Tools deserve a place of honor,  since they are the ones you use to make other objects. In fact, tools are  arguably what distinguished our hominid ancestors  from the animals. For my  part, as a maker of things for pleasure and work, tools [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the everyday objects you will own, Tools deserve a place of honor,  since they are the ones you use to make other<img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tools.jpg" alt="Tools" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="10" /> objects. In fact, tools are  arguably what distinguished our hominid ancestors  from the animals. For my  part, as a maker of things for pleasure and work, tools - the workshop kind -  have been my lifelong possessions and companions, so I will blog about them for  a bit.</p>
<p>The first point I want to share should be obvious, yet as the massive  commerce in low grade tools shows it certainly isn&#8217;t: when buying a tool, always  go for the best quality available. It does make a huge difference.</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/machinistssquare.jpg" alt="machinist's square" vspace="10" /></p>
<p>Take the tool in the photo: a machinist&#8217;s square for metal work. It was made  by Moore and Wright of Sheffield, a maker of precision tools since 1906. Now the  first time I bought a machinist square (I was in my teens), it was much prettier  than this one, and had a scale of centimeters along the edge too; it only had  one drawback: it had an angle just short of 90 degrees. So I took it back to the  store and got another, with an aluminum stock; this one was just over 90  degrees. Eventually I went to a better store and got the Moore &amp; Wright: no  scale, just an ugly lump of iron that tends to rust - but it still measures a  precise straight angle after decades.</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/metalsaw.jpg" alt="metal saw" vspace="10" /></p>
<p>Or take the saw in this photo. I had a cheaper one, and it would use the same  blades… only they would pop off the frame every so often. Only when I went and  got this more expensive one, made by Eclipse, did the problem go away - and all  it took was to have the little rods that go through the blade be longer! Little  details like these make a big difference to tool usability and usefulness - and  quality is all about the little details.</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/metalsaw-detail.jpg" alt="metal saw - detail" vspace="10" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/tools-1-quality-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An uncommunicative printer</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/an-uncommunicative-printer/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/an-uncommunicative-printer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bad design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HFE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/an-uncommunicative-printer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got this new HP LaserJet M5035 multifunction printer/copier  at my workplace that is very sophisticated and capable. It has a high res touch  screen that it uses to accept our commands and to tell us what&#8217;s going on.
So today it had a fault and advised me to cycle its power, which I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got this new HP LaserJet M5035 multifunction printer/copier  at my workplace that is very sophisticated and capable. It has a high res touch  screen that it uses to accept our commands and to tell us what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>So today it had a fault and advised me to cycle its power, which I did. The printer then went into a boot sequence, complete with whirring sounds and flashing lights, that took long minutes&#8230; very long minutes. <img src='http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And all through it, its wonderful display screen showed an HP logo growing larger and smaller, larger and smaller&#8230; endlessly. Very neat, but didn&#8217;t it occur to the designers of this machine that the user would much prefer a simple text message like &#8220;Machine warming up&#8230; should be ready <strong>in X minutes</strong>&#8220;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/an-uncommunicative-printer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sluggish response in our Home Electronics</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/sluggish-response-in-our-home-electronics/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/sluggish-response-in-our-home-electronics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bad design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer electronics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/sluggish-response-in-our-home-electronics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sony Mini-stereo on my desk has excellent sound,  which is the main thing I suppose; but it has some annoying misfeatures. Take  this one: what do you think happens when you hit the &#8220;Open CD Tray&#8221; button? If  you said &#8220;The CD tray opens&#8221;, think again. Eventually it does, but first, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p designtimesp="16935">The Sony Mini-stereo on my desk has excellent sound,  which is the main thing I suppose; but it has some annoying misfeatures. Take  this one: what do you think happens when you hit the &#8220;Open CD Tray&#8221; button? If  you said &#8220;The CD tray opens&#8221;, think again. Eventually it does, but first, the  display switches to say &#8220;OPEN&#8221; and this word blinks a few times. Then, after 2-3  seconds of deliberation, the tray opens - making the display totally redundant  (we can see that the tray is opening, Can&#8217;t we?!)</p>
<p designtimesp="16935"> <img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/sonyopen.jpg" alt="Sony mini-stereo display" /></p>
<p designtimesp="16939">Or take what happens when you hit the power off button.  The same display now says &#8220;STANDBY&#8221;, and blinks this unsolicited information for  maybe 6 seconds - then changes to &#8220;- - : - -  &#8220;, its standby indication. So why  didn&#8217;t it make this switch instantly? It isn&#8217;t as if it had to shut down a  nuclear reactor core…</p>
<p designtimesp="16939">This behavior, where our electronic creations take their  time before obeying, is seen in many devices around the house. I&#8217;d much rather  have them do as they&#8217;re told and shut down (and up!) instantly. <br designtimesp="16940" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/sluggish-response-in-our-home-electronics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mazda 3 evolution, take 1: Sometimes they listen!</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mazda-3-evolution-take-1-sometimes-they-listen/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mazda-3-evolution-take-1-sometimes-they-listen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bad design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Good design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Improvement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mazda-3-evolution-take-1-sometimes-they-listen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I replaced my old Mazda 3 with the new model.  The two are practically identical - why mess with a good thing? it&#8217;s a fine car!  - but there are some minor differences, and I&#8217;ll be blogging them now and then…  they afford us a peek into the design team&#8217;s thinking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p designtimesp="7894">Recently I replaced my old Mazda 3 with the new model.  The two are practically identical - why mess with a good thing? it&#8217;s a fine car!  - but there are some minor differences, and I&#8217;ll be blogging them now and then…  they afford us a peek into the design team&#8217;s thinking processes.</p>
<p designtimesp="7895">Here is the trunk door on the previous model. The problem  is, it is not spring loaded; to open it you had to press the lock button and  then claw it open by trying to pry up the bottom edge, which is a tight fit to  the bumper below it (on most cars the door at least has some depression, perhaps  for the license plate, where you can grasp it; this door is smooth and lacks any  such grab point).</p>
<p designtimesp="7897"><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/oldmazda3_trunkdoor.jpg" alt="Old Mazda 3 trunk door" /></p>
<p designtimesp="7897">Quite annoying, and a lovely bit of poor usability. In fact,  I saw one of these cars on the road whose enterprising owner had screwed a  handle - from a kitchen drawer, by the looks of it - onto this door!</p>
<p designtimesp="7898">So here is the same door on the new model. Same door -  one key difference: now there is a depression in the bumper to allow you to  grasp the door.</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/newmazda3_trunkdoor.jpg" alt="New Mazda 3 trunk door" /></p>
<p designtimesp="7901">People must have been complaining - and the design team  at Mazda had been listening. Better late than never!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mazda-3-evolution-take-1-sometimes-they-listen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mini, Maxi, Silly</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mini-maxi-silly/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mini-maxi-silly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bad design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mini-maxi-silly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a conscientious techie I do what many car owners don&#8217;t: I check the oil and other fluids in our cars once a month, rain or shine. But our latest car, the 2007 Renault Clio, seems determined to foil this good intention.
It used to be simple: A fluid would either have a straight dipstick with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a conscientious techie I do what many car owners don&#8217;t: I ch<img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/coolant.png" alt="Coolant reservoir" align="right" height="189" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="238" />eck the oil and other fluids in our cars once a month, rain or shine. But our latest car, the 2007 Renault Clio, seems determined to foil this good intention.</p>
<p>It used to be simple: A fluid would either have a straight dipstick with marks for Max and Min, or a clear reservoir with lines marking these two limit levels. The new Clio, however, abuses these age old concepts.</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/clioengine.jpg" alt="Renault Clio 2007 Engine compartment" height="301" vspace="10" width="500" /><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/cliobrakefluid.jpg" alt="Renault Clio 2007 Brake fluid reservoir" align="right" height="260" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="250" /></p>
<p>Like most modern cars its engine compartment is as densely packed with systems as an animal&#8217;s belly is with entrails; and the clear reservoirs for coolant and brake fluid are so positioned that there is no way on earth you can see all the level lines without either a dentist&#8217;s mirror or X-Ray vision. You can see the Maxi lines, but the Minis are hopelessly hidden (see photos).</p>
<p>As Obelix would&#8217;ve said: Ils sont fous, ces ingenieurs!</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/cliocoolant.jpg" alt="Renault Clio 2007 coolant reservoir" height="312" vspace="10" width="500" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/mini-maxi-silly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ode to a round knob</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/ode-to-a-round-knob/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/ode-to-a-round-knob/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Design history]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Good design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HFE]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/ode-to-a-round-knob/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;O knob, thou whose perfect roundness doth . . .&#8221;
Nah. A poet I&#8217;m not. Still, I would if I could, because the round knob is a fast disappearing species, a trend well worthy of lament.

Throughout the 20th century the round control knob was a mainstay of human interface design for electronic devices. With good reason: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;O knob, thou whose perfect roundness doth . . .&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Nah. A poet I&#8217;m not. Still, I would if I could, because the round knob is a fast disappearing species, a trend well worthy of lament.</p>
<p><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/roundknobs.jpg" alt="Round control knobs on an oscilloscope" height="269" vspace="10" width="500" /></p>
<p>Throughout the 20th century the round control knob was a mainstay of human interface design for electronic devices. With good reason: it was perfectly suited to humans&#8217; major feature, the opposable thumb. You grasped the knob between that thumb and forefinger and you had superb fine control of the knob&#8217;s angular position. If the function called for finer control, you just used a fatter knob. At the machine end of this human/machine interface the knob could rotate a switch, a variable capacitor, or a potentiometer - there were many analog devices back then that lent themselves well to rotary control.</p>
<p>Today most of our input components have gone digital, and are either computer controlled or handled by pushbutton switches. This makes sense in some cases, but there are still many situations when a function is intrinsically analog (say, a volume control on a car radio) yet the designers are making the controls digital (say, by using a pair of + and - pushbuttons). This is pure evil from a human engineering perspective: the round knob is much more intuitive, convenient,  and faster to boot. And it really was worthy of the name <strong>control</strong>: it gave the user a sense of controlling the instrument, instead of fighting it&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the electronics driving the volume these days are fully digital, but even so a round knob with some D/A conversion is the correct choice. It must also be more expensive to make, because the radio makers - preferring low cost to user experience - increasingly shy away from it. <img src='http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/ode-to-a-round-knob/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water cooler improvement - just don&#8217;t cool!</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/water-cooler-improvement-just-dont-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/water-cooler-improvement-just-dont-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Good design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Improvement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kitchenware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/water-cooler-improvement-just-dont-cool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many times, a small change in a design makes a product a lot better.
You know the modern version of the office water cooler: a vertical unit that dispenses cold (and in many models, also hot) water into disposable cups. Well, I&#8217;ve just seen one that made my day. The unit in the photo, a new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many times, a small change in a design makes a product a lot better.</p>
<p>You know the modern version of the office water cooler: a vertical unit that dispenses cold (and in many models, also hot) water into disposable cups. Well, I&#8217;ve just seen one that made my day. The unit in the photo, a new model from Tami (a.k.a. <a href="http://www.tanawater.com/index.html">Tana Water</a>), has a small but smart addition: the button marked &#8220;Room Temp&#8221;.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://designblog.nzeldes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tamibar4.jpg" alt="Tami Bar 4 water cooler" height="331" vspace="10" width="500" /></p>
<p align="left"> What&#8217;s the big deal? Well, in most models, you push the button and get ice-cold water. This must be very attractive if you&#8217;ve just jumped off a camel at a desert oasis on a scalding summer day; but in most offices, which are air conditioned, you don&#8217;t need it to be ice-cold, and some prefer it not to be. Their solution in the past was to either try to add a little boiling water, or to sip slowly. So now Tami have added the Room Temp button - you can get the same clean, filtered water, without the extra cooling. A tiny redesign, leading to a better product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/06/water-cooler-improvement-just-dont-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
