<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human or IVR? A reverse Turing Test!</title>
	<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/</link>
	<description>Nathan Zeldes blogs on everyday product design</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Zeldes</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>Not that I recall, Charlie. I think he just assumed the human will do his best to beat the computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I recall, Charlie. I think he just assumed the human will do his best to beat the computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Camden</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Camden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>If this young lady were the human component of a true Turing test, and strictly adhered to her script, then existing bots might be more convincing as a human.  Did Turing specify any minimum competency for the human component?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this young lady were the human component of a true Turing test, and strictly adhered to her script, then existing bots might be more convincing as a human.  Did Turing specify any minimum competency for the human component?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computerized humans, take 2 at Commonsense Design</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Computerized humans, take 2 at Commonsense Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>[...] I discussed how workers at customer call centers can turn into computer-like zombies. The other day I stood [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I discussed how workers at customer call centers can turn into computer-like zombies. The other day I stood [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Zeldes</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zeldes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Hey, that's an intriguing idea, Charlie! Worth a try next time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that&#8217;s an intriguing idea, Charlie! Worth a try next time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://designblog.nzeldes.com/2008/05/human-or-ivr-a-reverse-turing-test/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>what's even more interesting and amusing is attempting to game the script, answering questions that aren't answered, answering questions with questions, or answering questions that could allow correct results. for example, answering the home number question by repeating your cell number. it would be doubtful that the person asking the question would even recognize that it was a repetition since they get so locked into asking the questions on a script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s even more interesting and amusing is attempting to game the script, answering questions that aren&#8217;t answered, answering questions with questions, or answering questions that could allow correct results. for example, answering the home number question by repeating your cell number. it would be doubtful that the person asking the question would even recognize that it was a repetition since they get so locked into asking the questions on a script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
